CSS vs HTML Tables

[Talks_44]

wich one you prefer ?
and why ?
i prefer CSS because its more flexible and not so much code writing needed !

[Yowser]

I agree. I have a much easier time using CSS myself and like the results better.

[Geoserv]

CSS allows you to change your entire site using one file, as opposed to having to edit every page individually.

Much better.

Geoserv

[business opportunities]

CSS is better, though recently I had a big headache designing a site with DIVs and CSS. I had gotten the site to work properly in IE and was all excited. Then I tried it in Firefox.... um... not so good. I needed another couple of hours to fix it.

So, it is nice when it works, but when it doesn't.... well, tables seemed to be less of a problem.

[erikko]

i prefer CSS because for me its so nice for me to customize code rather than the table itself specially for a template

[Ar3d]

CSS is much faster in loading and light in terms of KB..

[amanda123]

Ya m ll also in the favour of CSS as it is so efficient and give us better result as compared to HTML .

[freediver]

Prefer CSS for flexibility, but be sure to check results in all major browsers (ie, firefox and opera).

[Brandon]

In with the new, out with the old. All sites should be coded in CSS from now on. Tables are out of style.

I can't wait till' vBulletin is 100% DIV/css.